Saurabh ganguly wife photo

Закрыть ... [X]

in India is an issue complicated by the country's large size & population, widespread poverty, lack of proper education & its diverse culture, even though being the world's largest , secular, . The provides for , which include . Clauses also provide for , as well as separation of executive and judiciary and freedom of movement within the country and abroad. The country also has an independent judiciary as well as bodies to look into issues of human rights.

The 2016 report of accepts the above-mentioned faculties but goes to state that India has "serious human rights concerns. Civil society groups face harassment and government critics face intimidation and lawsuits. Free speech has come under attack both from the state and by interest groups. Muslim and Christian minorities accuse authorities of not doing enough to protect their rights. But in the recent years, more emphasis is given to minority rights & freedom of speech.The government is yet to repeal laws that grant public officials and security forces immunity from prosecution for abuses."


Chronology of events regarding human rights in India[]


This section needs expansion. You can help by . (December 2017)

1950 The establishes a sovereign with universal adult franchise. Part 3 of the Constitution contains a enforceable by the Supreme Court and the High Courts. It also provides for reservations for previously disadvantaged sections in education, employment and political representation. 1952 repealed by government, former "criminal tribes" categorized as "" and (1952) enacted. 1955 Reform of family law concerning Hindus gives more rights to Hindu women.

Untouchability offenses Act (1955).

1958 1973 rules in that the basic structure of the Constitution (including many fundamental rights) is unalterable by a constitutional amendment. 1975-1977
extensive rights violations take place. 1978 SC rules in Menaka Gandhi v. Union of India that the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution cannot be suspended even in an emergency. 1978 Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act, 1978 1984 and the subsequent 1984 2006 Extrajudicial disappearances in Punjab by the police 1985-1986 The case, where the Supreme Court recognised the Muslim woman's right to maintenance upon divorce, sparks protests from Muslim clergy. To nullify the decision of the Supreme Court, the government enacted 1987 during communal riots in . 1989 is passed. 1989–present sees of , desecrating Hindu temples, killing of Hindus and Sikhs, and abductions of foreign tourists and government functionaries. (See: ) 1991–Present Kunan Poshspora incident occurred on February 23, 1991, when unit(s) of the launched a search and interrogation operation in the twin villages of Kunan and Poshpora, located in 's remote . It is reported that at least 100 women were gang raped by soldiers that night. However, human rights organizations including have said that the number of raped women could be as high as 150. (See : Human rights abuses in Jammu and Kashmir) 1992 A constitutional amendment establishes as a third tier of governance at the village level, with one-third of the seats reserved for women. Reservations were provided for scheduled castes and tribes as well. 1992 occurred after a political rally at the site turned violent. 1993 is established under the Protection of Human Rights Act. 2001 Supreme Court passes extensive orders to implement the right to food. 2002 which claimed at least thousand lives of Muslims and Hindus. 2005 A powerful is passed to give citizen's access to information held by public authorities. 2005 guarantees universal right to employment. 2006 Supreme Court orders police reforms in response to the poor human rights record of Indian police. 2009 declares that , which outlaws a range of unspecified "unnatural" sex acts, is unconstitutional when applied to homosexual acts between private consenting individuals, effectively decriminalising homosexual relationships in India. See also: . 2013 was passed by the on 19 March 2013, and by the Rajya Sabha on 21 March 2013, which provides for amendment of , , and on laws related to . 2015 was passed by both the Houses of the Parliament. This act aims to curb , or undisclosed foreign assets and income and imposes tax and penalty on such income.

Use of torture by police[]

The Asian Centre for Human Rights estimated that from 2002 to 2008, over four people per day died while in police custody, with "hundreds" of those deaths being due to police use of torture. According to a report written by the Institute of Correctional Administration in Punjab, up to 50% of police officers in the country have used physical or mental abuse on prisoners. Instances of torture, such as through a lack of sanitation, space, or water have been documented in West Bengal as well.

Religious violence[]

Main article:

Communal conflicts between religious groups (mostly between and ) have been prevalent in India since around the time of its independence from . Among the oldest incidences of communal violence in India was the , when massacred Hindus in Kerala. Communal riots took place during the between Hindus/Sikhs and Muslims where large numbers of people were killed in large-scale violence.

The was a four-day period during which Sikhs were massacred by members of the secular-centrist ; some estimates state that more than 2,000 were killed.</ref>[ Other incidents include the 1987 during communal riots in , 1992 . The killing was done at the behest of Congress leaders such as Jagdish Tytler. Congress Party officials provided assailants with voter lists, school registration forms, and ration lists. Nanavati Commission also found out that several Congress leaders were behind this lynching. Former prime minister Manmohan Singh apologized in the Loksabha for the involvement of Congress stalwarts in the Lok Sabha. According to the , the United States was convinced of Indian National Congress complicity in the riots and called it "opportunism" and "hatred" by the of Sikhs.

According to official figures, ended with 1,044 dead, 223 missing, and 2,500 injured. Of the dead, 790 were Muslim and 254 Hindu. Unofficial sources estimate that up to 2,000 people died. There were instances of , children being burned alive, and widespread looting and destruction of property. The Chief Minister at that time, , has been accused of initiating and condoning the violence, as have police and government officials who allegedly directed the rioters and gave lists of Muslim-owned properties to them. However, Narendra Modi was acquitted of such charges by none less than the honorable Supreme Court of India. The incident that resulted in the riots was the Muslim mob attack on a train full of Hindu pilgrims in the , where 58 Hindus were killed.

Lesser incidents plague many towns and villages; representative was the killing of five people in , during Hindu-Muslim rioting, which was triggered by the proposed celebration of a Hindu festival. Other such communal incidents include the , which was carried out by the group , as well as communal riots in executed by the Islamist against Hindus.

Caste related issues[]

Main articles: , , and

Contemporary India, however, has seen the influence of caste start to decline. This is partly due to the spread of education to all castes which has had a democratising effect on the political system. However, this "equalising" of the playing field has not been without controversy. The and its quotas system has been a particularly sensitive issue. It has been argued by Professor Dipankar Gupta that the role of castes in Indian elections have been overplayed.

More recently there has been a flux in caste politics, mainly caused by . This upsurge in lower-caste empowerment was accompanied in some regions by a spike in the level of corruption. This was partly due to lower caste perceiving development programs and rule of law as tools used by the upper caste to subjugate lower castes.

says "it is the responsibility of the Indian government to fully enact and apply its legal provisions against discrimination on the basis of caste and descent.

, along with many collectively 60 million in population, continue to face social stigma and economic hardships, despite the fact 1871, was repealed by the government in 1952 and replaced by (HOA) (1952), as effectively it only created a new list out of the old list of so-called "criminal tribes. These tribes even today face the consequences of the 'Prevention of Anti-Social Activity Act' (PASA), which only adds to their everyday struggle for existence as most of them live . and UN's anti-discrimination body (CERD) have asked the government to repeal this law as well, as these former "criminalised" tribes continue to suffer oppression and social ostracization at large and many have been denied SC, ST or OBC status, denying them access to which would elevated their economic and social status.

Freedom of expression[]

Main article:

According to the estimates of , India ranks 122nd worldwide in 2010 on the press freedom index (down from 105th in 2009). The press freedom index for India is 38.75 in 2010 (29.33 for 2009) on a scale that runs from 0 (most free) to 105 (least free). In 2014 India was down ranked to 140th worldwide (score of 40.34 out of 105) but despite this remains one of the best scores in the region.

The , while not mentioning the word "press", provides for "the right to freedom of speech and expression" (Article 19(1) a). However this right is subject to restrictions under subclause (2), whereby this freedom can be restricted for reasons of " and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, preserving decency, preserving morality, in relation to contempt of court, , or incitement to an offence". Laws such as the and (POTA) have been used to limit press freedom. Under POTA, person could be detained for up to six months before the police were required to bring charges on allegations for terrorism-related offenses. POTA was repealed in 2004, but was replaced by amendments to UAPA. The Official Secrets Act 1923 is abolished after right to information act 2005

For the first half-century of independence, media control by the state was the major constraint on press freedom. famously stated in 1975 that is "a Government organ, it is going to remain a Government organ..."

With the liberalisation starting in the 1990s, private control of media has burgeoned, leading to increasing independence and greater scrutiny of government.

Organisations like and have been particularly influential, in bringing about the resignation of powerful minister . In addition, laws like act passed in recent years contribute significantly to reducing the control of the press by the government.

LGBT rights[]

Main article:

Until the decriminalised consensual private sexual acts between consenting adults on 2 July 2009, homosexuality was considered criminal as per interpretations of the ambiguous of the 150-year-old Indian Penal Code (IPC), a law passed by the colonial British authorities. However, this law was very rarely enforced. In its ruling decriminalising homosexuality, the noted that existed law conflicted with the fundamental rights guaranteed by the , and such criminalising is violative of Articles 21, 14 and 15 of the Constitution.

On 11 December 2013, homosexuality was again criminalized by a ruling.

By state[]


Main article:

The Human Rights situation in the northeastern Indian state of Assam deteriorated rapidly after the Indian Army was deployed in November 1990 to fight against secessionist insurgents. To contain the insurgents and to diminish the support they enjoyed, especially in the rural areas, security forces have indulged in extrajudicial executions, custodial deaths, torture and rape. One the one hand, common villagers are intimidated and terrorized to divulge information about insurgents and on the other, insurgents are physically eliminated. The security operations, conducted under the give soldiers blanket immunity against any legal interference, have reduced the region to a killing field. The has conducted massive search operations in "thousands of villages in Assam" during which actions were taken against peoples that included civilians and young people of having militant sympathies. As per the Assamese villagers having sympathy for militants groups, has claimed that they have been threatened, harassed, raped, assaulted, and killed by soldiers who attempt to fright them into identifying "suspected militants. " Though proofs have been provided by the officials, the tribals claims that Arbitrary arrests and kidnappings by security forces are common in Assam. Deaths in custody have occurred due to torture as well as alleged encounters as per the allegations by locals many of whom are known to be supportive to Miitant organization and have supported violence by insurgents.

A Human Rights Watch report notes that journalists and human rights activists have been arrested for falsely reporting on human rights abuses. Assam continues to be one of the forefront states where the claims of human rights abuses have been committed by India. Resultant secessionist and pro-independence movements have intensified the political situation, with widespread allegations of human rights abuses being committed by Indian security forces yet without any concrete proofs for allegations.Freedom House stated in their 2013 report on India that journalists in rural areas and regions coping with insurgencies — including Assam — are vulnerable and face pressure from both sides of the conflicts.


Main article:

From 1984 to 1994, the state of in northern India was engaged in a power struggle between the militant secessionist and Indian security forces. The Indian government responded to the escalating by launching in 1984, storming the , or Golden Temple complex in —the center of Sikh religious and spiritual life, where some militant groups had retreated. The Operation was controversial and resulted in death of hundreds of civilians, militants and soldiers. After this incident, bodyguards assassinated Prime Minister , further violence ensued.

The aftermath of these events were felt for more than a decade. According to a report, state security forces adopted “increasingly brutal methods to stem the insurgency, including arbitrary arrests, torture, prolonged detention without trial, and summary killings of civilians and suspected militants”. Militant organizations responded with increased violence aimed at civilians, state security forces, and Sikh political leaders deemed to be negotiating with the government.

Jammu and Kashmir[]

Main articles: and

A soldier guards the roadside checkpoint outside Srinagar International Airport in January 2006.

Several international agencies and the have reported human rights violations in . In a press release the OHCHR spokesmen stated "The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights is concerned about the recent violent protests in Indian-administered Kashmir that have reportedly led to civilian casualties as well as restrictions to the right to freedom of assembly and expression.". A 1996 report accuses the Indian military and Indian-government backed paramilitaries of "committ[ing] serious and widespread human rights violations in Kashmir." One such alleged massacre occurred on 6 January 1993 in the town of . The Human Rights Watch also wrote of other regular human rights abuses being committed by the Indian forces including "using rape as a means to punish and humiliate communities". described the incident as such: "In retaliation for the killing of one soldier, paramilitary forces rampaged through Sopore's market setting buildings ablaze and shooting bystanders. The Indian government pronounced the event 'unfortunate' and claimed that an ammunition dump had been hit by gunfire, setting off fires that killed most of the victims." In addition to this, there have been claims of disappearances by the police or the army in Kashmir by several human rights organisations.

Many human rights organisations such as and the (HRW) have condemned human rights abuses in Kashmir by Indians such as "extra-judicial executions", "disappearances", and torture; the "", (AFSPA) which "provides impunity for human rights abuses and fuels cycles of violence. The AFSPA grants the military wide powers of arrest, the right to shoot to kill, and to occupy or destroy property in counterinsurgency operations. Indian officials claim that troops need such powers because the army is only deployed when national security is at serious risk from armed combatants. Such circumstances, they say, call for extraordinary measures." Human rights organisations have also asked Indian government to repeal the Public Safety Act, since "a detainee may be held in administrative detention for a maximum of two years without a court order.". One 2008 report determined that , was 'partly Free',

Other Human Rights Violations[]

Conflicts such as have sometimes escalated to violence between communal groups, despite government and police efforts to mediate the situation.[]

Invasive methods like 'narcoanalysis' (controlled anaesthesia), , and tests were once commonly permitted by Indian courts for crime investigation. Even though according to Indian constitution "nobody may be made a witness against himself".[]

Concerns regarding human rights violations in conducting deception detection tests (DDT)s were raised long back and the had published Guidelines in 2000 for the Administration of Polygraph tests. However, only few of the investigating agencies were seen to follow these guidelines.

However, on May 5, 2010 the Supreme Court in India (Smt. Selvi vs. State of Karnataka) declared brain mapping, lie detector tests and narcoanalysis to be unconstitutional, violating Article 20 (3) of Fundamental Rights. These techniques cannot be conducted forcefully on any individual and requires consent for the same. When they are conducted with consent, the material so obtained is regarded as evidence during trial of cases according to Section 27 of the Evidence Act.

Inadequate investigation and hasty rulings by courts have caused some of innocent people causing them to languish in jail for many years. For instance, the Bombay high court in September 2009 asked the Maharashtra government to pay ₹ 100,000 as compensation to a 40-year-old man who languished in prison for over 10 years for a crime he didn't commit.[]

Muslim Woman’s Rights in India[]


This section needs expansion. You can help by . (April 2015)

A young Muslim woman in India is depicted here, in the Thar desert, located near Jaisalmer, India.

One of the vital concerns in is the non-discrimination between genders. Woman in India are one of the major groups deprived of their equality within the framework. Their hardship has derived from cultural and religious reasons. This includes being negatively stereotyped within , incorporating both Muslim and even Judaic-Christian beliefs. This also includes male interpretations of the . Where the functions of a woman concerning family matters are seen as less than half, according to , then that of their male counterparts.

Brief history of Muslim Law in India[]

in South Asia is different from of . Shariat law (shari’a or fiqh) law is seen as a body of religious rules that are set out to manage the lives, in all aspects, of every Muslim. However, in India there are only a few of these laws that are enforced. This is due to India’s laws having been modified by traditional English and equitable principles since the beginning of the regime. It is now called Anglo-Muhammadan law. Although Islamic law is sacred, due to modern political and social developments sacred interpretation of classic Islamic law’s in India have changed in response to societal requirements.

The outlines the to under Article 14. Article 15 covers freedom from which includes that of . However, Article 25 justifies the freedom of religion which safeguards the religious rights of Muslim communities, in turn , which is discriminatory between Muslim men and woman. The continuance of discrimination within Muslim personal law contravenes that set out in India’s constitution, notably articles 14 and 15.

Personal law and inequality[]

Even though there is formal recognition of rights within the constitution, Muslim women experience gender in-equalities in practice within the sphere of personal law. Personal law enables the continuing practice of giving a lower status to Muslim women in India. Which raises the need for . This is hard to achieve because often uniformity of family laws are often upheld by staunch supporters of religious traditions, who will ensure that all efforts to keep practices within the conformity of Islamic ideals. The courts will also favor to not let constitutional rights intrude in personal law. In the High Court case Harvinder Kaur v. Harmander Singh Choudhary, it was rejected that personal law was discriminatory towards and stated that the “…introduction of Constitutional law into the home is most inappropriate”. Essentially depriving all woman in India the fundamental rights within the constitution. Personal law discrimination was on the other hand was positively recognized in the case of Amina (Case Law: Amina v/s Unknown. AIR 1992), here the court noted that Muslim personal law is discriminatory towards Muslim women, and as such is unconstitutional.

does however provide for certain rights. One example can be seen within a matrimonial deed, or Nikahnama. A Nikahnama can cover certain rights which pertain to polygamy and the woman’s right to enforce a divorce proceeding. This could even include shares in property rights. Muslim law for financial support due to divorcement has been codified In the Muslim Women’s (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986. Nevertheless, these rights remain minimal. For example, the divorced wife can only receive three months of financial support. Also the husband of the divorced wife only has to pay child support for 3 months if that child is born within the three-month period, but if they had a child before that then the husband is not obligated to pay any support. Woman’s rights in these matters are often not practiced due to Muslim women’s lack of education toward their rights within the Islamic community. Also Muslim woman in India are not protected when it comes to monogamous marriages, but Muslim men are, protected under the Indian Penal Code.

The Human Rights Commission under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights highlighted religious based personal laws In India’s report in 1997. It was informed that the framework towards should be a remedy when addressing clearly biased provisions and practices towards Muslim women in Islamic legal community.

Muslim woman and Education[]

are often discriminated against due to their lower achievements within the sphere of education, employment and their general economic position. This is because traditionally Muslim woman are discriminately excluded from participating within the public and private sector.

See also[]


  1. . Retrieved 2016-08-02. 
  2. . 2016-01-08. Retrieved 2016-08-02. 
  3. ^ , Human Rights Watch, 21 November 2007
  4. , AI Index ASA 20/019/2000, Amnesty International, 15 May 2000
  5. ,
  6. . Wikipedia. 2018-03-30. 
  7. ^ Mitta, Manoj; Singh, Smriti (3 July 2009). . The Times of India
  8. . Reuters. 25 June 2008. 
  9. Malik, Saurabh. . The Tribune. Archived from on 3 March 2009. Retrieved 15 May 2011. 
  10. 26 February 2004
  11. Nichols, B (2003). (PDF). Australasian Political Studies Association Conference
  12. . . 6 May 2011. Retrieved 10 May 2011. 
  13. . BBC. 11 May 2005. 
  14. Ganguly, Meenakshi. . Human Rights Watch. 
  15. Jaffrelot, Christophe (July 2003). (PDF). Heidelberg Papers in South Asian and Comparative Politics: 16. Retrieved 5 November 2013. 
  16. ^ , p. 265.
  17. . Archived from on 11 August 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2016. 
  18. . 2005. 
  19. Meena Radhakrishna (16 July 2006). . . folio: Special issue with the Sunday Magazine. Archived from on 6 July 2007. Retrieved 31 May 2007. 
  20. , Mon, 19 March 2007.
  21. 2 December 2008 at the . , , Volume 19 – Issue 12, 8–21 June 2002.
  22. 21 July 2011 at the ., Reporters Without Borders
  23. 30 September 2015 at the ., Reporters Without Borders
  24. 14 February 2014 at the ., Reporters Without Borders
  25. Kalhan, Anil; et al. (2006). "Colonial Continuities: Human Rights, Antiterrorism, and Security Laws in India". 20 Colum. J. Asian L. 93.   Freely accessible
  26. <Please add first missing authors to populate metadata.> (July 1982). . PUCL Bulletin. People's Union for Civil Liberties. 
  27. letter by , director of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Rights Programme at
  28. . Times of India. Archived from on 27 April 2016.  External link in |title= ()
  29. SHYAMANTHA, ASOKAN (11 December 2013). . . Retrieved 23 December 2013. 
  30. (PDF). shodhganga
  31. (PDF). Human Rights Watch. 5 (7). 
  32. . The Times of India. Jun 6, 2016. 
  33. . Human Rights Defence International (HRDI). April 8, 2012. 
  34. ^ (PDF). Human Rights Watch. 1990. 
  35. Kaur, Jaskaran (2004). . Ensaaf. 
  36. . Dateline. 4/3/2002. Archived from on 12 September 2007. Retrieved 2009-04-27.  Check date values in: |date= ()
  37. , Press release, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, United Nations, 27 August 2008
  38. , Human Rights Watch, 1 May 1996
  39. (PDF). Human Rights Watch .  Missing or empty |title= ()
  40. , Time, 18 January 1993. (subscription required)
  41. , 2006 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, U.S. Department of State, 6 March 2007
  42. , BBC News, 8 March 2007
  43. , Human Rights Watch, 1999
  44. , , 2008-07-02
  45. ^ Math, SB (2011). . Indian J. Med. Res. 134: 4–7.   Freely accessible.  . 
  46. Syed Mehartaj Bejum Human Rights in India: Issues and Perspectives (2000, A.P.H. Publishing Corporation, New Delhi) at 188.
  47. ^ At 188.
  48. ^ At 190.
  49. Vrinda Narain Gender and Community: Muslim Women’s Rights in India (2001, University of Toronto Press Incorporated, Canada) 2001 at 7.
  50. ^ At 7.
  51. ^ At 36.
  52. At 43.
  53. At 3.
  54. ^ Syed Mehartaj Bejum Human Rights in India: Issues and Perspectives (2000, A.P.H. Publishing Corporation, New Delhi) at 190.
  55. Vrinda Narain Gender and Community: Muslim Women’s Rights in India (2001, University of Toronto Press Incorporated, Canada) 2001 at 49.
  56. At 49.
  57. At 49
  58. At 51.
  59. At 190
  61. ^ At 28.
  62. Syed Mehartaj Bejum Human Rights in India: Issues and Perspectives (2000, A.P.H. Publishing Corporation, New Delhi) at 191.
  63. Vrinda Narain Gender and Community: Muslim Women’s Rights in India (2001, University of Toronto Press Incorporated, Canada) 2001 at 25.
  64. Syed Mehartaj Bejum Human Rights in India: Issues and Perspectives (2000, A.P.H. Publishing Corporation, New Delhi) at 191
  65. ^ At 191.


Related News

Importancia de la espectrofotometria
Photo shoots for portfolios
Eye see you photography
How to take good photos
Photos of kruger national park
Tupac autopsy photo fake
Famous director of photography
Custom wooden photo panel